AXA Joins Greenwashing Ranks
If you are a regular reader of IrishEVs, you’ll know that our initial focus has always been to fight the common myths about electric vehicles to help Irish citizens make better informed decisions about driving a battery electric vehicle, and how this could cut their carbon footprint.
However, the rapid rise in greenwashing – the act of companies claiming to be sustainable while doing nothing to cut emissions – has led us to focus increasingly on this subject over the past year.
Month after month we are seeing more and more corporations indulging in greenwashing activities in Ireland, which are designed to confuse consumers and allow them to continue profiting from high emissions that worsen the Climate Crisis.
Today, again, we focus on another Irish brand joining the greenwashing ranks: AXA Insurance.
Offsetting Responsibility
Despite the fact that the EU has stopped allowing offsets to be counted towards emissions reductions targets from the start of 2021, AXA Insurance recently accounted that it will be offsetting carbon produced by the cars it insures.
The insurance company claims it will “offset 100% of the carbon emissions produced by all new and existing car customers for one year”. Their website states that it will plant 600,000 native trees across 200 hectares at a cost of €2 million.
While this might all sound well and good, the issue is that without actually reducing emissions, carbon offsetting simply doesn’t work.
Planting trees that may take upwards of 30 years to capture as much carbon as is needed to ‘offset’ the emissions produced by Irish cars renders this an entirely useless strategy, and one that was likely dreamed up by a PR team rather than anyone with any scientific knowledge.
The issue of carbon offset greenwashing is perhaps best summarised by journalist and climate activist George Monbiot’s quote: “Buying and selling carbon offsets is like pushing the food around on your plate to create the impression that you have eaten it.”
We have reached out to AXA Ireland via email on multiple occasions over the past few weeks and have not received a single response. The questions we put to AXA are as follows:
Can you confirm the specific tree species being planted as part of your partnership with The Nature Trust?
What is the typical age of the trees being planted as part of your partnership with The Nature Trust?
Considering the EU will stop allowing offsets to be counted towards emissions reductions targets from 2021, how can AXA justify this as anything more than a greenwashing campaign?
Insuring EVs
Insurance companies have come a long way in recent years in supporting electric car adoption.
While the industry was slow to support EVs initially, with insurance rates having typically been higher than those for petrol or diesel cars – with many insurers increasing the premiums for EVs or declining to insure them – we have seen a significant shift to the point where EV insurance is now often the cheapest option.
That said, there are still a number of insurance companies in Ireland who do not offer cover for electric cars, and this needs to change, and needs attention from regulators and the government to ensure that widespread and affordable adoption is increased to help the country meet its essential Climate Crisis emissions targets.
Combatting Greenwashing
While AXA Insurance isn’t alone in greenwashing, it is highly disappointing to see them replicating the same tired and lazy approach that has been debunked so many times for offering absolutely no value in cutting emissions.
It is frankly imperative at this point that the Irish government step up and address the issue of greenwashing head-on to stem the constant flow of misinformation campaigns that are designed to baffle consumers and place the burden for emissions reductions on tax payers – rather than those with the greatest emissions.
A prime example that we should be following is that of the government in the Netherlands.
They have called out Shell for its ads which claim that their fuel is ‘carbon neutral’ as they will offset the emissions of their customers, banning the adverts on the basis that there is no scientific proof to their claims.
The adverts suggest that customers paying an extra cent per liter of fuel will mean their money can cancel out the emissions produced from the burning of fossil fuels. Needless to say this is entirely untrue and simply a way to guilt-trip consumers into spending more.
This is almost identical to the campaign run by Applegreen here in Ireland, which is similarly unscientific and based on promoting misinformation to increase profits.
“Our research shows that this forest was not actually being logged in the years before Shell started protecting it”
Lisa van Langen, a student at Vrije University’s Climate Change and Sustainability Law Clinic in Amsterdam, commented: “One form of carbon compensation that the company offers is a pledge to protect forests in Peru from logging. Our research shows that this forest was not actually being logged in the years before Shell started protecting it.”
“Also, forests are absorbing increasingly less carbon, and the forest could burn down. Shell wants to compensate climate damage that is 100% definite with a measure that they cannot know for sure will work, or for how long it will work.”
While forests are absorbing less carbon, the recent IPCC Report confirmed that atmospheric CO2 concentrations are now higher than any time in at least 2 million years.
We simply do not have the time or ability to mitigate the emissions we create – the only viable way forward is to dramatically cut emissions and to cut them immediately.
Those greenwashing corporations like Shell, Applegreen and AXA are profiting from sustaining or worsening emissions, and we simply must not allow them the opportunity to enhance their reputations from disinformation campaigns that are anything but ‘green’.
What To Read Next
The Rise of Greenwashing
We investigate the rising culture of greenwashing amongst Irish brands who are using PR to appear "green" in order to increase their profits - while placing the onus for climate action on their customers
Biofuel: A Greenwashing Battleground
Biofuels have consistently been marketed as a 'green' alternative to fossil fuels, which hides their sky high emissions, human rights abuses & ecological impact
The Problem With PR
We look at the ethics of naming and shaming PR agencies who reinforce greenwashing in Ireland and abroad, and what this means for the climate crisis