Cowardice, Compassion & Climate Politics

We are in the midst of a cost of living crisis that began long before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and which is only set to worsen significantly as the Climate Crisis escalates in the coming years.

Rising costs associated with everything from fuel and energy, to food and clothing have led to more people living on the precipice of poverty in Ireland than ever before. All of this was avoidable if our politicians had heeded calls over the last four decades to invest in renewable energy, to divest from intensive farming and subsidising fossil fuels, while also placing controls on rents.

Yet, here we are nearly half a century later faced with the reality that food prices are rising, fuel and energy bills are at an all-time high, and those who are already living in the most precarious positions in society will bear the brunt of the Climate Crisis, despite typically having the lowest carbon footprints.

Today we look at the consistent cowardice of Irish politicians in addressing the Climate Crisis and the need for greater compassion at home and around the world as the Climate Emergency intensifies.

“Shop Around”

In early 2022 as the cost of living crisis worsened, Seán Fleming, the Minister of State at the Department of Finance made the following remarks in an RTE Drivetime interview:

“Instead of people complaining, because you’ve listed two or three opposition TDs who have complained, I’m saying it would be more practical and give people suggestions. If you move around you can get better prices and that’s in our own hands.”

“The best thing to do is, if you need to change your supermarket, change your supermarket. If you need to change who you order your oil from every so often, change that too. I’ve shopped around in relation to my health insurance. And it does take time and effort, and if people put in time and effort they will actually get reductions.”

Electricity prices for households in Ireland have increased significantly since 2010, and are indicative of the rising cost of living for Irish people. Credit: Statistica

Mr Fleming, who has a net income of around €1,000 per week, should be aware that between March and June 2020 more than 2.3 million meals were provided by the FoodCloud food bank, that the number of homeless people in Ireland rose from 6,906 in 2016 to over 10,500 by the end of 2019, and that up to 28% of households in Ireland are in, or at risk of, energy poverty.

That’s more than a quarter of the population of Ireland on a daily basis having to make the choice between heat and food, or simply living with ever-growing arrears for their utility bills.

This isn’t about shopping around.

While Mr Fleming may have swiftly apologised for his remarks, they are indicative of the contempt with which the Irish Government currently holds the Irish people, and the contempt they are showing for climate action.

The peatlands in the northern hemisphere alone store approximately 450 billion tonnes of carbon (Gorham, 1991). Yet some Irish politicians are still pushing for industrial destruction of these vital carbon sequesters. Credit: Peter Mooney

Turf ‘Lunacy’

Mr Fleming’s disdain for Irish people impacted by the cost of living and climate crises isn’t an anomaly in the Dáil, and the proposed ban on the sale of turf raised this week is evidence of that.

The ban recognises the latest IPCC report, which sets out that we have just three years to negate the worst outcomes of the Climate Crisis and maintain a livable world – or face mass extinction.

Yet we quickly saw contempt from elected Irish officials, with independent TD, – and Chairperson of the Turf Cutters and Contractors Association – Michael Fitzmaurice calling the proposed ban “lunacy”.

When IrishEVs contacted Mr Fitzmaurice about his comments and his clear conflict of interest as the chair of an industry behind the destruction of turf bogs across Ireland, he stated that he had not read the IPCC report and actively engaged in climate denial:

“As I’m sure you already know, the full report runs to circa 3,676 pages and the straight answer to your question, which I’m sure you already know, is – no, I have not read the full report. However, my researchers and I will read the entire report. Despite much of it not being likely to be pertinent to Ireland.”

[N.B.  IPCC reports are a globally-focused studies which report on planetary climate system, and as such relate to every nation on Earth. Greenhouse gases do not discriminate based on national borders. The Summary for Policymakers is also only 32 pages long]

“When we have completed our review, we will form our own conclusions. Based on the summary document, some of the data sets surrounding Asia numbers raise red flags – particular in terms of levels of confidence in attribution to climate change in terms of its observed impacts on ecosystems and human systems. We will be examining the methodologies used in terms of these aspects of the report.”

[N.B. The report was compiled over many years by thousands of scientists using millions of current and historical data points. It is the most accurate understanding of climate science – and the role of humans in worsening the Climate Crisis – that humans have ever produced]

We would point out to IrishEVs readers that a man who has a background in agriculture and turf cutting, with a vested interest as the leading figure in the turf cutting industry, believes he has the knowledge to question the methodologies and findings of the brightest scientific minds on Earth across multiple fields of scientific disciplines.

This is not a politician acting in the best interests of those who elected him. This is a man with clear vested interests who has not read the IPCC report but yet is free to question it and is quoted by agricultural media on a regular basis.

Sadly, he isn’t alone.

Regina Doherty – the Leader of Seanad Éireann, Fine Gael – labelled the proposed ban as “Virtue signalling at its very best” on Twitter, stating “There are 53 data centres in Ireland, 8 under construction and 26 with planning permission and do we hear a single peep about them? Sharing a few bags of turf though!!!”

Of course, Doherty has chosen to overlook that Ireland exported 919,371 tonnes of peat in 2020, according to the Government’s own figures, and that Ireland is engaged with peat extraction on a scale unmatched by most countries.

This has not only had major Climate Crisis and public health repercussions – with 1,300 people in Ireland dying prematurely each year due to air pollution – but also reduces the number of bogs acting as vital carbon sequesters.

The disconnect between the rhetoric of Doherty’s vision of pastoral turf gathering with the reality of industrial peat extraction was perfectly encapsulated by Pádraic Fogarty on Twitter.

The pastoral image of ‘cultural’ peat harvesting does not tally with the brutal industrial processes by which peat is extracted at volume today. Credit: Pádraic Fogarty

Furthermore, her comments overlook that she is in a position to push through legislation to support people in adopting renewable energy to alleviate energy poverty and help meet Ireland’s necessary emissions reduction targets.

It should be noted that Doherty has a 0% climate score on Not Here, Not Anywhere, having voted against climate action on 14 occasions, failed to vote in favour of climate action on any occasion, and been absent or failed to cast a vote on 6 occasions.

We contacted Doherty to ask if she had read the latest IPCC report but did not receive a response.

Her comments would suggest that she likely has not.

Micheál Martin has consistently doubled-down on climate action by 2050 - despite this being entirely at odds with the IPCC, who have made clear that this constitutes far too little, far too late

Top-down Discompassion

We can see the lack of compassion in Irish politics most clearly in the words and actions of the Taoiseach, Micheál Martin.

After the publication of the sixth major IPCC report last summer, Mr Martin doubled down on climate action by 2050 – something that the report expressly stated would be too little, too late, and which will consign millions to death and billions more to displacement as the Climate Crisis worsens.

Mr Martin’s cowardice in the face of overwhelming demand for climate action was compounded in November, following the conclusion of COP26.

Despite having signed Ireland to a global pledge to cut methane emissions by 30% compared to 2020 levels, he immediately stated that this pledge would not be included in Ireland’s forthcoming carbon budgets, which target a 10% cut in methane.

When rightly challenged about his empty promises by Rosin Shortall – a TD who has consistently shown compassion and a demand for meaningful climate action, something that seems to set the Social Democrats apart from most major Irish political parties – Mr Martin responded accusing her of “an abundance of negativity”.

This has major global implications, as well as here at home in Ireland.

Yet Mr Martin’s focus on 2050 and flippant responses to the urgent and vital challenges against his inaction from fellow politicians shows his disregard for the plight of those living outside Ireland.

As such, he is directly engaging in climate imperialism.

Time and again Irish politicians lack the understanding, care and compassion necessary to help those with the greatest need for support in Irish society.

The focus on neoliberalism and free market capitalism for Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil puts them directly at odds with the needs of the majority of Irish people. Those in power are pursuing eternal growth and profits at the cost of the ordinary person’s health, happiness and right to a liveable planet.

A quick glance at their pay packets – the average TD now earns a salary in excess of €100,000 per year – shows how out of touch they are with the average Irish person, who earns €49,296.

If the cost of living becomes overwhelming, then the cost of the cost of dying can seem like the only viable and affordable solution for some.

The average Irish person has a carbon footprint nearly three times larger than the average person on Earth and 55% larger than the average EU citizen. Despite our small geographical footprint, our carbon footprint is enormous. This needs to change - and fast - if we are to hit climate targets. Credit: New York Times

With understandably rising rates of mental health issues across the country, public officials elected to act in our best interests should be acting urgently on lower the cost of living, with kindness and compassion.

Or be held accountable for the consequences.

Brave Politics

Many of the issues with Irish politics are reflected in other political systems the world over – none more so than the growing ubiquity of the career politician.

However, there are rare examples of governments committed to enacting real change for the betterment of the people who elected them.

Perhaps there can be no better example than the 1996 National Firearms Agreement in Australia, which implemented stricter gun laws in response to mass shooting events, particularly the Port Authur massacre, in which 35 people were killed.

While many, especially in rural areas, were loath to accept tighter restrictions on gun ownership, the Australian government pressed ahead with the ban on all semi-automatic rifles and all semi-automatic and pump-action shotguns, as well as implementing limited licensing – resulting in thousands of unlicensed firearms being surrendered under a gun amnesty.

It is also important to note that this was a Conservative government, who knew from the outset that the policy was at odds with their voter base. And yet they went ahead with it regardless because it was in the best interests of those who elected them.

We would highly recommend watching John Oliver’s report on this for The Daily Show in 2013 to understand the measures that were taken.

The piece includes former Premier of Queensland, Rob Borbidge, commenting on the conviction to do the right thing, no matter the political cost: “We paid a high political price, but we did the right thing. There are Australians alive today because we took that action. How much is a life worth?”

This cost many of the politicians their careers – but they knew it was the right thing to do, and pressed ahead for the good of the country and its people. They exercised political bravery to do the right thing.

Following the ban, Australia has had no mass shootings since 1996. Furthermore, the ban brought about additional societal benefits, including reduced homicide rates by up to 60%, while youth suicides also declined dramatically.

It is time Irish politicians stepped up to end their cowardice and arse-covering to maintain a cushy job at the cost of inaction. We have no time to waste with less than three years to overcome the worst outcomes of the Climate Crisis – and we have already wasted three years of inaction since the Irish government announced (but have yet failed to act on) a Climate Emergency.

Instead, it is time for them to show compassion and leadership in the face of the Climate Crisis. To recognise the severity of the Climate Crisis, the timescale of what we face – including the potential extinction of a third of all life by 2070 – and ask: “How much is life worth?”

 

What To Read Next

Ecocide: Making Environmental Destruction A Crime

New legal definitions could have major implications for holding corporations and governments criminally accountable for offences against the environment

RTÉ and the Climate Crisis

Eight months on from Jon Williams' public apology for RTÉ News' failure to properly cover the Climate Crisis, we investigate what has changed, and how far the national broadcaster has to go

Stark Irish Political Response To IPCC Report Puts Climate Justice Into Harsh Perspective

Ireland must learn from the wrongs of Direct Provision when implementing a just transition to cater for those displaced by the Climate Crisis